iPhone 4 – What Doesn’t It Do?

8 06 2010

Did I hear you ask what Apple’s latest wonder phone can’t do? Here are a few answers that matter to me:

  • Tie into an online ecosystem to extend a user’s session/data into the cloud. If these devices are the future, we need a way to store and access our media in the cloud. I would be fine paying for MobileMe if it had online media storage for iTMS purchased audio and video. Right now, I get most of what MobileMe offers from Google (free) and Flickr ($25).
  • Double capacity from the previous model – we are stuck at 32 GB for now. Maybe those new high capacity DRAM chips are still too scarce. I was really looking forward to this.
  • Allow videocalls – the kind that have been popular throughout the world for at least five years now. Videocalling was already old news when the film ‘Lost in Translation’ came out in 2003 and featured Japanese teens making video calls. They’ll get it right eventually, but not every network is as spotty as AT&T.
  • Flash… LOL. Who cares about Flash? Not me.

This refresh makes it pretty easy for me to skip until the next revision, and I’ll get the new iOS 4 either way. Sure, iPhone 4 has a lot of neat features too:

  • Nicer form factor – thinner, better materials.
  • Better screen – officially retina pleasing.
  • Better battery – I’ll take an extra hour of talk time.
  • Faster CPU – is it as big a jump as the leap from 3G to 3Gs?
  • Way better camera – back illuminated CMOS and flash = win.
  • Gyroscope – will get put to good use by developers (games).

But at $800 without a contract, those new features address problems that I personally did not have with the old design.

I love my iPhone. After three years on iPhone there is little chance I’ll switch to Android. But I won’t run out to get the iPhone 4 either. It is pretty though…

Apple Canada – iPhone 4 – Video calls, multitasking, HD video, and more.





Vietnam Owns Apple

15 05 2010

Figuratively and literally, Apple is being owned by a popular Vietnamese tech website whose forum dwellers have scored a 4G iPhone and the unannounced MacBook refresh in the span of a week. The CPU is bumped up to 2.4GHz and the video system is upgraded to the Nvidia 320m.





Why Would Apple Want to Use AMD Processors?

20 04 2010

I always imagined a trip to Apple’s Cupertino HQ to start off with clandestine back alley meeting followed by blindfolded ride in the back of a dark car. Sadly, I never got a chance to find out. My pal at Apple came up to Calgary to meet me and my company of the time.

But maybe such secrecy is warranted because nothing seems to get you noticed quite like a meeting at Apple’s offices. Lately, it would seem that quite a few folk from AMD are making the trip.

I can see AMD Opterons in Xserve, and more RADEONs (of FireGL) in lots of Macs but I don’t see how power hungry, low performance Athlons and Phenoms offer any appeal to Apple.





How Could Apple Make Mac Gaming Better?

17 10 2009

I think Apple needs a Mac app store – and I think one is coming very soon. Like the iPhone, casual games will demonstrate demand for good games and the big players will smell a market they want a piece of.

What makes me think Apple could strike Gold twice? Read the rest of this entry »





The Apple Tax

16 10 2009

Sure, I would love my lovely MacBook Pro to cost me less but unless I was willing to settle for a refurb, there were no deals to be had.

So I anted up last month and got the mid-level 15″ model with some nice Back to School perks – I graduated from University 15 years ago, but no one at Best Buy seemed too concerned about my current scholastic status.

What perks? A free HP all-in-one printer, iWork09 and Smith Micro Photoshop Elements 6/Stuffit Deluxe kits were thrown-in gratis. No mail in rebate required. Read the rest of this entry »





Quick Look: MacBook Pro 13″

13 09 2009

The first MacBook was great, but it had a tendency to turn leg skin into chicharon what with its searing hot plastic shell. After a few revisions each of which successively cooler in temperature, the unibody MacBook came out. It was great too, but its combination of price and features was confusing – it was called MacBook, but looked like a pro and was priced somewhere in between the two.

Now we have the MacBook Pro 13″  - it is priced like a Pro, spec’ed like a Pro and looks very Pro. It also makes the plastic MacBook about as desirable as a nasty case of Climydia (is there such as things as a mild case?). Read the rest of this entry »





Quick Look: MacBook Air (Revision B)

28 08 2009

I have been coveting a MacBook Air since they came out. I finally pulled the trigger on a new old stock sealed Rev B model at a local retailer for $1579 CDN including an in-store 4 year warranty, Canon MP480, Airport Express and Adobe Photoshop Elements 6.

What do I think of it?

  • First generation MacBook Air’s came with nicer looking packaging. A little thing, but I was disappointed by my Air’s boring white box.
  • Form factor is amazing. Thin, light but solid. It reminds me of the Toshiba Portege R100 I loved a few years ago.
  • This is about as revolutionary as…. nothing. It is not revolutionary at all. Similar notebooks have existed for years.
  • Despite being sculpted from aluminum there remains a plastic hinge that is less than confidence inspiring – this is especially true in light of many broken hinges that plagued the first generation MacBook Air. Mine developed a hairline crack after a week of light use (no travel).
  • The keyboard is terrific, and the automatic backlighting works much better than that on the old MacBook Pros and PowerBooks. When this feature first came out I found it was a distraction, but now it is indispensible.
  • Apple still provides a mouse button on the track pad. The Air lacks the new glass touchpad.
  • It has a mono speaker. Seriously.
  • Battery life was average never surpassing 4 hours with brightness at about 25%. When a $400 CULV based netbook with 4 GB of RAM and 250 GB HDD can get 8 hours on a charge, the MacBook looks like a poor value at $1500.
  • Heat is an issue if you actually use the Air. Start watching video and the GPU heats up right away. Use it on a uneven surface and likewise the heat will build up quickly.
  • Screen quality is exceptional, particularly when compared to the MacBook – there is a huge difference.
  • But screen resolution is mediorce. Budget notebooks are coming out with 1366*768 LED panels in 11″ sizes. Apple can fit more pixels into their 13″ screen.
  • Performance is good – but you would have a tough time using this as a primary PC. It is an expensive companion to a more powerful computer. This is not pokey slow like most netbooks.
  • Lack of ports is an issue for some – but a week into using it I have not once missed having more ports.
  • Most of my concerns are with value for the money.
  • Pricing is silly. There is no way that this notebook is worth $1500 in its basic trim. Apple is stuck in 2004 with their pricing strategy – they may not have noticed how many ultraslim notebooks are available in 2009 for much less than the Air. A Lenovo X200 can be had with better specs for $800 CDN.
  • Overall, I am not sure that I will be keeping my MacBook Air. I love everything about it except the value equation. At three times the cost of a CULV netbook,I am really struggling with whether or not it is worth it. Even for a big OS X fan like me.

Apple needs to adjust the price on this line. As a companion to a main Mac such as an iMac or MacBook Pro, the current pricing is simply too high. The 13″ MacBook Pro offers a much more practical mobile companion that can actually function very well as a primary computer.

Needless to say, mine is going back to the store.





My Take on the Tablet – Again. If Anyone Cares.

23 08 2009

Why ponder the elusive Tablet when there is a giant hole in Apple’s lineup staring us right in the face – the MacBook.

MacBook is important to Apple and it has languished since the unibody (later to be called Pro) 13″ version. There is a clearer distinction now between the Pro/non-Pro Macbooks but current plastic model seems like an afterthought. There is no good, better, best option.

Unless they plan to kill the MacBook, it seems likely to me that Apple has some plans for that segment. Could it be a tablet?

No, I think the Tablet fits into the iPod range. If it exists, it will be a very specialized product.

MacBook is Apple’s general purpose entry level PC – it’s hard to imagine that going away. Right now the platform Apple uses is very good – Nvidia’s 9400m IGP chipset. Apple will not ruin it by installing useless Atom or only slightly less useless CULV CPU in it.

Apple’s minimum standard for a computer that will run iLife is Intel Dual Core. Therefore, the only way to differentiate MacBooks from Pros is by using Intel value CPUs with less cache, slower RAM and a plastic case.

Despite these penalties the plastic MacBook delivers about 90% the performance of the 13″ Pro. Lucky for Apple they managed to make the 13″ MacBook Pro extremely appealing with its hard core battery stamina and gorgeous screen (not to mention its hot body).

I think that when Apple moves MacBook Pros to the next Intel notebook Core 2 Duo refresh – alleged to use a faster 1333 MHz bus and matching DDR3 plus Nvidia’s new and improved IGP (lets call 205m) - that we will see a 9400m based value MacBook at the $799 price point. It will essentially stand pat in terms of performance (but at a lower price) as the Pros get much faster.

The new Intel CPU and Nvidia chipset will feature a GPU that is 30-40% faster than the 9400m and memory that is 30% faster. That will open up a reasonably big gap in performance between the base MacBook Pro 13″ and the regular MacBook. That discrepancy in performance will allow Apple to position everyone’s favorite polycarbonate volksputer in the value segment at the low low price of $799 or even $699 if they are feeling generous. I imagine an integrated battery will be employed allowing for a thinner and sturdier chassis and posibly some other design tweaks – but you will still know exactly what it is when someone walks by with one.

With decent hardware like a 9400m GPU, Apple’s unmatched software (Snow Leopard and iLifeX) and a very competive price I can see 15% marketshare becoming a real possibility. Look for these changes to happen in the next six to nine months.





Coming Soon…

22 08 2009

About time I post some new reviews, eh?

  • Acer Extensa 5536-5519
  • Apple MacBook Air
  • Asus G50Vt (a bit older but there are lots of them available refurb’ed)

Stay tuned.





What I Would LIke: New Entry Level Macbooks Before September

7 07 2009

Apple’s low-end Macbook line is looking sparse now that the unibodies are sorted out, with a single lonely model available to budget conscious Apple aficionados.

Back to School looms on the horizon and there is still the matter of a price competitive entry level Macbook to sort out (it is seriously over due). This and ‘budget friendlier’ iMacs should drive lots of volume.

  • 1.6 Ghz CULV Intel CPU
  • 13″ LCD
  • 2 GB RAM (800 MHz)
  • Nvidia 9300m (lower spec 9400m but still 2x Intel GMA) or ATI discrete (4330)
  • 160 GB HDD
  • No optical drive
  • 802.11n (no BT)
  • OSX 10.6 if possible or 10.5 with up to date program.
  • $699
  • White plastic but .5″ thinner
  • 7 hour battery

Netbook interest is waning but a whole bunch of new CULV notebooks are to be sprung on unsuspecting consumers over the next two-three months. These are real Core 2 Duo CPUs going into tiny form factor notebooks that PC makers have had 3 years to develop and perfect. A usable ultra portable for $500 running Windows 7 is not something you want to face off against if all you have is a $999 Macbook with it’s admittedly faster innards but dated looks.

There will be a whole lot more Macs in homes in 2010 when Apple launches their MacOS App Store at WWDC.